Difficult Pasts and Haunted Presents: Contemporary Archaeology and Conflict in an Age of Global Uncertainty
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18778/0208-6034.34.01Keywords:
contemporary archaeology, difficult heritage, conflict, psychotherapyAbstract
This article examines the role of archaeology in contemporary society. It works from the premise that archaeology is a form of socio-political action and explores some of the ways in which archaeologies of the recent past can have therapeutic or cathartic effects. Three case studies are presented. The first two focus on the recovery of war dead and the memorialization of conflict landscapes at Fromelles, in northern France, and Peleliu, in Micronesia. The third explores the materiality of unauthorised migration in the US-Mexico borderlands of southern Arizona. The central argument presented in this article is that in an age of global uncertainty, where support for the humanities is in decline and respect for academic knowledge is diminishing, archaeologists should re-position their work to more clearly focus on contemporary social issues. If archaeology is to survive as a discipline it must be seen as being socially relevant research, with the capacity to contribute to contemporary public discourses.
Downloads
References
Buchli V., Lucas G. (2001), The Absent Present: Archaeologies of the Contemporary Past, [in:] V. Buchli, G. Lucas (ed.), In Archaeologies of the Contemporary Past, Routledge, London–New York, p. 21–25.
Google Scholar
Cameron C. (2010), The Unnatural History of Heritage: What’s the Future for the Past?, “Journal of Heritage Tourism”, 5 (3), p. 203–218, https://doi.org/10.1080/1743873X.2010.505289
Google Scholar
Connerton P. (2009), How Modernity Forgets, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627187
Google Scholar
De León J. (2012), “Better to Be Hot than Caught”: Excavating the Conflicting Roles of Migrant Material Culture, “American Anthropologist”, 114, p. 477–495, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1433.2012.01447.x
Google Scholar
Gokee C., De León J. (2014), Sites of Contention: Archaeological Classification and Political Discourse in the US-Mexico Borderlands, “Journal of Contemporary Archaeology”, 1 (1), p. 133–163, https://doi.org/10.1558/jca.v1i1.133
Google Scholar
González-Ruibal A. (2007), Making Things Public: Archaeologies of the Spanish Civil War, “Public Archaeology”, 6 (4), p. 203–226, https://doi.org/10.1179/175355307X264165
Google Scholar
González-Ruibal A., Edensor T., Funari P., Hall M., Holtorf C., Leone M., Meskell L., Oliver L., Saunders N., Schofield J., Zarankin A. (2008), Time to Destroy: An Archaeology of Supermodernity, “Current Anthropology”, 49 (2), p. 247–279, https://doi.org/10.1086/526099
Google Scholar
Graves-Brown P. (2000), Matter, Materiality and Modern Culture, Routledge, London–New York.
Google Scholar
Graves-Brown P., Harrison R., Piccini A. (2013), The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of the Contemporary World, Oxford University Press, Oxford, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199602001.001.0001
Google Scholar
Harrison R., Schofield J. (2009), Archaeo-Ethnography, Auto-Archaeology: Introducing Archaeologies of the Contemporary Past, “Archaeologies”, 5 (2), p. 185–209, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11759-009-9100-5
Google Scholar
Hicks D. (2003), Archaeology Unfolding: Diversity and the Loss of Isolation, “Oxford Journal of Archaeology”, 22 (3), p. 315–329, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0092.00190
Google Scholar
Holtorf C., Høgberg A. (2015), Contemporary Heritage and the Future, [in:] E. Waterton, S. Watson (ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of Contemporary Heritage Research, Palgrave Macmillan, Manchester, p. 509–523, https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137293565_32
Google Scholar
Holtorf C., Piccini A. (2009), Contemporary Archaeologies: Excavating Now, Peter Lang, Frankfurt am Main.
Google Scholar
Jackson P. (2010), Putting Names to the Lost Soldiers of Fromelles, “BBC News. Magazine”: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/8473444.stm (access 19 I 2018).
Google Scholar
Johnson M. (1999), Rethinking Historical Archaeology, [in:] P.P.A. Funari, M. Hall, S. Jones (ed.), Historical Archaeology. Back from the Edge, Routledge, London– New York, p. 23–36.
Google Scholar
Kobyliński Z. (2015), Which Archaeology Does the Modern World Need?, [in:] K. Kristiansen, L. Šmejda, J. Turek (ed.), Paradigm Found. Archaeological Theory – Present, Past and Future, Oxbow Books, Oxford–Philadelphia, p. 156–166, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvh1dpc1.16
Google Scholar
The Land of Open Graves. Living and Dying on the Migrant Trail (2015), University of California Press, Oakland.
Google Scholar
Lee D. (2017), Obama Tolerance Tweet Becomes Most Liked, “BBC News. Magazine”: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-40945096 (access 25 I 2018).
Google Scholar
Loe L., Pathy-Barker C., Brady K., Cox M., Helen W. (2014), “Remember Me to All”: The Archaeological Recovery and Identification of Soldiers who Fought and Died in the Battle of Fromelles, 1916, Oxford Archaeology, Oxford.
Google Scholar
Logan W., Reeves K. (2008), Places of Pain and Shame: Dealing with “Difficult Heritage”, Routledge, London–New York, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203885031
Google Scholar
Macdonald S. (2010), Difficult Heritage. Negotiating the Nazi Past in Nuremberg and Beyond, Routledge, London–New York, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203888667
Google Scholar
Moshenska G. (2017), Public Archaeology Beyond Commodities, Alienation and the Fourth Wall, [in:] R. Bernbeck, K.P. Hofmann, U. Sommer (ed.), Between Memory Sites and Memory Networks, Edition Topoi, Berlin, p. 303–314.
Google Scholar
Price N., Knecht R. (2012), Peleliu 1944: The Archaeology of a South Pacific D-Day, “Journal of Conflict Archaeology”, 7 (1), p. 5–48, https://doi.org/10.1179/157407812X13245464933786
Google Scholar
Price N., Knecht R., Ballinger S., Cypra S., Emesiochel C., Hesus T., Kloulechad E., Lindsay G., McQuillen D., Ngirmang S.O. (2013), After the Typhoon: Multicultural Archaeologies of World War II on Peleliu, Palau, Micronesia, “Journal of Conflict Archaeology”, 8 (3), p. 193–248, https://doi.org/10.1179/1574077313Z.00000000026
Google Scholar
Rathje W. (1979), Modern Material Culture Studies, [in:] M.B. Schiffer (ed.), Advances in Archaeological Method & Theory, Academic Press, New York, p. 1–27.
Google Scholar
Rathje W., LaMotta V., Longacre W. (2001), “Into the Black Hole: Archaeology and Beyond”, [in:] B. Cunliffe, W. Davies, C. Renfrew (ed.), Archaeology. The Widening Debate, Published for The British Academy by Oxford University Press, London, p. 497–539.
Google Scholar
Rathje W., Murphy C. (2001), Rubbish! The Archaeology of Garbage, University of Arizona Press, Tucson.
Google Scholar
Schiffer M. (2015), William Laurens Rathje: The Garbage Project and Beyond, “Ethnoarchaeology”, 7 (2), p. 179–184, https://doi.org/10.1179/1944289015Z.00000000034
Google Scholar
Shanks M. (1992), Experiencing the Past. On the Character of Archaeology, Routledge, London–New York.
Google Scholar
Sontag S. (2003), Regarding the Pain of Others, “Diogène”, 1, p. 127–139, https://doi. org/10.3917/dio.201.0127
Google Scholar
Tilley C. (1989), Archaeology as Socio-political Action in the Present, [in:] V. Pinsky, A. Wyle (ed.), Critical Traditions in Contemporary Archaeology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 104–116.
Google Scholar
Trzciński M., Borkowski T. (2015), Forensic Archaeology in Poland, [in:] M. Groen, N. Márquez-Grant (ed.), Forensic Archaeology. A Global Perspective, Wiley Blackwell, Chichester, p. 121–127, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118745977.ch15
Google Scholar
Vidler A. (1992), The Architectural Uncanny. Essays in the Modern Unhomely, MIT Press, Cambridge.
Google Scholar
White H. (1987), The Content of the Form. Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore–London.
Google Scholar
Włodarczyk R. (2010), Działania kryminalistyczne, medyczne i organizacyjne w sytuacjach zdarzeń masowych ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem identyfikacji genetycznej zwłok i szczątków ludzkich z pogorzeliska, Wydawnictwo Wyższej Szkoły Policji, Szczytno.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
